Pursuant to and in implementation of the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, hereinafter referred to as the Treaty, the Parties have exchanged data current as of January 3, 1993, on the number of nuclear weapons for which each heavy bomber of a type and a variant of a type equipped for nuclear weapons is actually equipped. No later than 30 days after the date of entry into force of the Treaty, the Parties shall additionally exchange data, current as of the date of entry into force of the Treaty, according to the categories of data contained in this Memorandum, on heavy bombers equipped for nuclear weapons; on heavy bombers specified as reoriented to a conventional role, and on heavy bombers reoriented to a conventional role that are subsequently returned to a nuclear role; on ICBMs and SLBMs to which a reduced number of warheads is attributed; and on data on the elimination of heavy ICBMs and on conversion of silo launchers of heavy ICBMs.

          Only those data used for purposes of implementing the Treaty that differ from the data in the Memorandum of Understanding on the Establishment of the Data Base Relating to the START Treaty are included in this Memorandum. [START I Treaty MOU, ABA, Memorandum of Attribution]

1. Pursuant to paragraph 3 of Article IV of the Treaty each Party undertakes not to have more nuclear weapons deployed on heavy bombers of any type or variant of a type than the number specified in this paragraph. Additionally, pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article IV of the Treaty, for each Party the numbers of warheads attributed to deployed heavy bombers not reoriented to a conventional role as of the date of signature of the Treaty or to heavy bombers subsequently deployed are listed below. Such numbers shall only be changed in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article IV of the Treaty. The Party making a change shall provide a notification to the other Party 90 days prior to making such a change. An exhibition shall be conducted to demonstrate the changed number of nuclear weapons for which heavy bombers of the listed type or variant of a type are actually equipped:
   1. United States of America

   Heavy Bomber Types and Variant of a Type*	Number of Warheads
   B-52G	12
   B-52H	20
   B-1B	16
   B-2	16
   Aggregate Number of Warheads Attributed to Deployed Heavy Bombers, Except for Heavy Bombers Reoriented to a Conventional Role

   2. Russian Federation

   Heavy Bomber Types and Variant of a Type	Number of Warheads
   Bear B	1
   Bear G	2
   Bear H6	6
   Bear H16	16
   Blackjack	12
   Aggregate Number of Warheads Attributed to Deployed Heavy Bombers, Except for Heavy Bombers Reoriented to a Conventional Role

II. Data on Heavy Bombers Reoriented to a Conventional Role and Heavy Bombers Reoriented to a Conventional Role that Have Subsequently Been Returned to a Nuclear Role [ABA, Memorandum of Attribution]

1. For each Party, the numbers of heavy bombers reoriented to a conventional role are as follows:

_____________________________________________________________________

          * Heavy bombers of the type and variant of a type designated B-52C, B-52D, B-52E, and B-52F, located at the Davis-Monthan conversion or elimination facility as of September 1, 1990, as specified in the Memorandum of Understanding to the START Treaty, will be eliminated, under the provisions of the START Treaty, before the expiration of the seven-year reductions period.

 

1. United States of America

Heavy Bomber of Type and Variant of Type	Number
__________	__________
__________	__________

 

2. Russian Federation

   Heavy Bomber of Type and Variant of Type	Number
   __________	__________
   __________	__________

2. For each Party, the numbers of heavy bombers reoriented to a conventional role as well as data on related air bases are as follows:
   1. United States of America

      Air Bases: Name/Location	Bomber Type and Variant of a Type __________
      __________
      Heavy Bombers Reoriented to a Conventional Role	Number __________

   2. Russian Federation

      Air Bases: Name/Location	Bomber Type and Variant of a Type __________
      __________
      Heavy Bombers Reoriented to a Conventional Role	Number __________

3. For each Party, the differences observable by national technical means of verification for heavy bombers reoriented to a conventional role are as follows:

   1. United States of America

      Heavy Bomber Type and Variant of a Type __________

      Difference __________

   2. Russian Federation

      Heavy Bomber Type and Variant of a Type __________

      Difference __________

4. For each Party, the differences observable by national technical means of verification for heavy bombers reoriented to a conventional role that have subsequently been returned to a nuclear role are as follows:

   1. United States of America

      Heavy Bomber Type and Variant of a Type __________

      Difference __________

   2. Russian Federation

      Heavy Bomber Type and Variant of a Type __________

      Difference __________

III. Data on Deployed ICBMs and Deployed SLBMs of Which a Reduced Number of Warheads Is Attributed [ABA, Memorandum of Attribution]

          For each Party, the data on ICBM bases or submarine bases, and on ICBMs or SLBMs of existing types deployed at those bases, on which the number of warheads attributed to them is reduced pursuant to Article III of the Treaty are as follows:

1. United States of America

   	Type of ICBM or SLBM
   Deployed ICBMS or Deployed SLBMs, on Which the Number of Warheads Is Reduced	____
   Warheads Attributed to Each Deployed ICBM or Deployed SLBM After Reduction in the Number of Warheads on It	____
   Number of Warheads by Which the Original Attribution of Warheads for Each ICBM or SLBM Was Reduced	____
   Aggregate Reduction in the Number of Warheads Attributed to Deployed ICBMs or Deployed SLBMs of that Type	____

ICBM Bases at Which the Number of Warheads on Deployed ICBMs Is Reduced:




Name/Location _______________________	ICBM Type on Which the Number of Warheads Is Reduced
Deployed ICBMs on Which the Number of Warheads Is Reduced	____
Warheads Attributed to Each Deployed ICBM After Reduction in the Number of Warheads on It	____
Number of Warheads by Which the Original attribution of Warheads for Each ICBM Was Reduced	____
Aggregate Reduction in the Number of Warheads Attributed to deployed ICBMs of thatType	____

SLBM Bases at Which the Number of Warheads on Deployed SLBMs Is Reduced:



Name/Location _______________________	SLBM Type on Which the Number of Warheads Is Reduced
Deployed SLBMs on Which the Number of Warheads Is Reduced	____
Warheads Attributed to Each Deployed SLBM After Reduction in the Number of Warheads on It	____
Number of Warheads by Which the Original attribution of Warheads for Each SLBM Was Reduced	____
Aggregate Reduction in the Number of Warheads Attributed to deployed SLBMs of thatType	____

1. Russian Federation

   	Type of ICBM or SLBM
   Deployed ICBMS or Deployed SLBMs, on Which the Number of Warheads Is Reduced	____
   Warheads Attributed to Each Deployed ICBM or Deployed SLBM After Reduction in the Number of Warheads on It	____
   Number of Warheads by Which the Original Attribution of Warheads for Each ICBM or SLBM Was Reduced	____
   Aggregate Reduction in the Number of Warheads Attributed to Deployed ICBMs or Deployed SLBMs of that Type	____

ICBM Bases at Which the Number of Warheads on Deployed ICBMs Is Reduced:



Name/Location _______________________	ICBM Type on Which the Number of Warheads Is Reduced
Deployed ICBMs on Which the Number of Warheads Is Reduced	____
Warheads Attributed to Each Deployed ICBM After Reduction in the Number of Warheads on It	____
Number of Warheads by Which the Original attribution of Warheads for Each ICBM Was Reduced	____
Aggregate Reduction in the Number of Warheads Attributed to deployed ICBMs of thatType	____

SLBM Bases at Which the Number of Warheads on Deployed SLBMs Is Reduced:



Name/Location _______________________	SLBM Type on Which the Number of Warheads Is Reduced
Deployed SLBMs on Which the Number of Warheads Is Reduced	____
Warheads Attributed to Each Deployed SLBM After Reduction in the Number of Warheads on It	____
Number of Warheads by Which the Original attribution of Warheads for Each SLBM Was Reduced	____
Aggregate Reduction in the Number of Warheads Attributed to deployed SLBMs of thatType	____

IV. Data on Eliminated Heavy ICBMs and Converted Silo Launchers of Heavy ICBMs [ABA, Memorandum of Attribution]

1. For each Party, the numbers of silo launchers of heavy ICBMs converted to silo launchers of ICBMs other than heavy ICBMs are as follows:
   1. United States of America
      
      

      Aggregate Number of Converted Silo Launchers
      	____
      ICBM Base for Silo Launchers of ICBMs: Name/Location ______	ICBM type Installed in a Converted Silo Launcher
      Silo Launcher Group: (designation) ______
      Silo Launchers: ______	______

   2. Russian Federation
      

      Aggregate Number of Converted Silo Launchers
      	____
      ICBM Base for Silo Launchers of ICBMs: Name/Location ______	ICBM type Installed in a Converted Silo Launcher
      Silo Launcher Group: (designation) ______
      Silo Launchers: ______	______

2. For each Party, the aggregate numbers of heavy ICBMs and eliminated heavy ICBMs are as follows:
   1. United States of America

      	Number
      Deployed Heavy ICBMs	____
      Non-Deployed Heavy ICBMs	____
      Eliminated Heavy ICBMs	____

   2. Russian Federation

      	Number
      Deployed Heavy ICBMs	____
      Non-Deployed Heavy ICBMs	____
      Eliminated Heavy ICBMs	____

          Each Party shall notify the other Party of changes in the attribution and data contained in this Memorandum.

          The Parties, in signing this Memorandum, acknowledge the acceptance of the categories of data contained in this Memorandum and the responsibility of each Party for the accuracy only of its own data.

          This Memorandum is an integral part of the Treaty and shall enter into force on the date of entry into force of the Treaty and shall remain in force so long as the Treaty remains in force. As provided for in subparagraph 2(b) of Article V of the Treaty, the Parties may agree on such additional measures as may be necessary to improve the viability and effectiveness of the Treaty. The Parties agree that, if it becomes necessary to change the categories of data contained in this Memorandum or to make other changes to this Memorandum that do not affect substantive rights or obligations under the Treaty, they shall use the Bilateral Implementation Commission to reach agreement on such changes, without resorting to the procedure for making amendments set forth in Article VII of the Treaty.

          DONE at Moscow on January 3, 1993, in two copies, each in the English and Russian languages, both texts being equally authentic.