U.S. Department of State
Other State Department Archive SitesU.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
The State Department web site below is a permanent electronic archive of information released online from January 1, 1997 to January 20, 2001. Please see www.state.gov for current material from the Department of State. Or visit http://2001-2009.state.gov for information from that period. Archive sites are not updated, so external links may no longer function. Contact us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein.
U.S. Department of State

Great Seal Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright
Interview By Jim Lehrer of "The Lehrer News Hour"
January 9, 2001, Washington, D.C.
As released by the Office of the Spokesman
U.S. Department of State
Blue Line

MR. LEHRER: We go now to a summing up interview with Secretary of State Madeleine Albright to look back on her eight years in the Clinton Administration, the first four as UN Ambassador, the last four as Secretary of State.

Madame Secretary, welcome.

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Good to be with you, Jim.

MR. LEHRER: First on this terrorism question, do you agree with the officer who just said that the terrorism threat is enduring and it's not going away and -- well, you heard what he said.

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I do. It is something that is of major concern to all of us whose responsibility it is to deal with Americans abroad. My responsibility has obviously been for our diplomatic structures and for the diplomats that are abroad. As a result of the bombings that we endured in Kenya and Tanzania, we have taken huge steps to get our embassies into a more secure position, looking at property, how to have better security procedures.

I now have a daily briefing from my chief security officer on what the threats are. And one of the biggest challenges is --

MR. LEHRER: You mean specific threats that --

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Specific threats that we go through. For instance, we had closed the Embassy in Rome over the weekend because we had some threat information. I spoke with Foreign Minister Dini about it. The Italian Government has been very cooperative, and we have reopened.

But I do think that when we have so many Americans out abroad that we have to take that responsibility very seriously. The hard part is what it does to the resources of the State Department, because I don't want to have a choice between recommending that we have secure embassies with nobody in them, or people out delivering programs out of trailers. It has been a huge concern of ours. It's not a macho thing; it's something that has to be done. You have to worry about the diplomats that are out there.

MR. LEHRER: Do you agree with Secretary Cohen, who also said on that piece today, that the threat from terrorism is more immediate and more serious in terms of the military threat to the United States than the traditional threats that we've had in the past?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I would agree with that. I mean, we obviously continue to be worried about nuclear proliferation, but the combination of what terrorists can come up with and the irrationality of their actions, and the fact that they can be two or three people that make up their mind to do something, it is a constant threat. We have to make clear that we will deal with it.

What is interesting, Jim, is that right now there is a trial going on in The Hague, the Lockerbie trial over the Pan Am bombing.

MR. LEHRER: The closing arguments started today, in fact.

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Right. It shows, really, that we have to be persistent. It may take a long time. There are also trials going on in New York to do with the bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. We have to keep pursuing, and we have to be very clear. But I agree obviously with Secretary Cohen.

MR. LEHRER: Have you discussed this with Colin Powell about the continuation of alerts and that sort of thing having to do with terrorism?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Yes, I have, because I really think that it is something that is quite different from the time that a lot of the people that are now coming into the new Bush Administration, what they had to face before. It's a daily new issue. Obviously people don't like to work inside barriers and feel that our embassies have to be somewhere way out of the center of town, but it's a whole new issue. Secretary-Designate Powell and I have talked about it, and I think that he will see how important it truly is to our functioning.

MR. LEHRER: On to other things, the Middle East. Is it now certain for all practical purposes that there will be no movement between the Israelis and the Palestinians between now and the time you and President Clinton go out of office on the 20th?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I wouldn't put it with that kind of certitude. I don't want to offer any false hope, nor do I want to kind of say it's all over, but we are going to be working on this till the day we leave. Ambassador Dennis Ross will be going out to the region. We're in contact with the parties. I think that it's our responsibility to keep trying, but I don't want to give any false hope. But we are going to keep working on it.

MR. LEHRER: Without going into a lot of the specifics, in general terms, what is the problem?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I think the problem is that these are existential issues for both parties. The issue of Jerusalem has clearly been central. The question as to whether the Palestinian refugees have a right to return to Israel versus just to a new Palestinian state that might emerge from this, the size of the territory, and the security issues.

The thing here, Jim, is that while we may not be able to resolve this, and the ideas that President Clinton put forward will leave with us, the basic issues that we began to talk about at Camp David and the ideas that have been presented ultimately have to be a part of the solution because they are the very basic ideas.

MR. LEHRER: Did you ever consider the possibility that it may not be possible to negotiate a peace between these two parties because their demands and their desires are just not reconcilable?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: You have that feeling certainly at certain times in the middle of the night when we've been dealing with them, but I think we have to keep trying because you can't also leave things with the kind of tragedy and violence that we've seen in the Middle East.

I think there are those who believe that the US is kind of injecting itself into this story. It's the other way around, where the parties in various times and ways call up either me or President Clinton and say, "Do something." You know, "We need your help and we need to have your help in negotiating this." I think ultimately there has to be some resolution, but the problem is that you can't have two sides wanting 100 percent.

MR. LEHRER: But, in other words, you don't think they could ever work it out by themselves?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: They have to make the hard decisions. We can't do that for them. Obviously it would be better if they could do it by themselves, but they call and ask for help from us or other international players.

MR. LEHRER: What do you say to those who say: "Hey, wait a minute. Things are actually worse because the US is trying to push its own plan and getting involved in things that maybe these folks don't need to be pushed on, and that has caused the violence, in fact"?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Well, I have tried to stay away from vulgar language on this, but I really do think that we have not pushed this. We have responded to requests to do something, to have ideas, to try to narrow the gaps. I think this is not caused by the United States, but caused by the very deep, deep divisions, and they call for our help.

The other part that's interesting is that they also -- I mean, I can't tell you how much time I spend on the phone every day talking to other foreign ministers from all over Europe or the Arab countries who say, "What can you do? What are you doing? Can we help something, too?" This is an international problem and a regional dispute that affects everybody.

MR. LEHRER: As you leave office, do you feel in your own heart and soul and mind that the Middle East is a safer and better place because you were here?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I can say that we have tried our best, that I wish that the violence weren't going on, and I wish that we had gotten further. When I have been asked about what has been the most difficult negotiation and where have I been the most frustrated, I certainly would put the Middle East at the top of the list.

But I think that it has gone through violent periods and then peaceful periods, and unfortunately there is kind of a strange paradox that sometimes the closer you get to peace the more likely there are to be the enemies of the peace that come out. That is what we found in the assassination of Prime Minister Rabin and some of the violence that comes out. It is a rather paradoxical situation.

But we've done a lot. We were asked to do it. Do I wish it had ended differently? Absolutely. But I think we've done the right thing.

MR. LEHRER: And that's the top of your list as your number one frustration?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Absolutely.

MR. LEHRER: What is on the top of your list of your number one accomplishment, the thing you're the most proud of?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: The thing I am the most proud of is basically what's happened in Central and Eastern Europe and the Balkans. What I have found -- and I think my successor will find this also -- is that foreign policy is a continuum; we are here temporarily and the foreign policy goes on.

President Bush, the first President Bush, had talked about a Europe that was undivided and whole and free, and that Administration did a great deal in terms of the reunification of Germany. They left us the disintegration of Yugoslavia, and that was the missing piece -- the Balkans. We were able to pick that up -- very difficult -- and now that missing piece is in place. The limited application of limited force in the area worked, and there are now democracies in the Balkans and a great hope for peace and a Europe that is in fact whole and free and undivided.

Now, the story isn't over, and one of the issues that I've handed over to Secretary-designate Powell is the Balkan story that needs to be continued.

The expansion of NATO was terrific, also.

MR. LEHRER: But he wants -- or the suggestion at least is that he wants US troops out of the Balkans. Have you talked to him about this?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: We generally talked about that. We didn't want the troops to stay there forever. That clearly has never been the plan. We have talked about various benchmarks about how the troops went and how they should come out.

But the worst part would be to get them out too early, and there is a total misunderstanding here because there are those who believe that the United States is carrying the bulk of the weight in this. That's not true. The Europeans have around 80, 85 percent of the forces, and they are the ones that are providing the bulk of the reconstruction and economic assistance. So we're doing our part, and we shouldn't leave.

MR. LEHRER: Looking back on it now, the Kosovo conflict was labeled "Madeleine's War." Does that bother you now?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: No. And at the time, I figured it came with the territory. It was used a pejorative, not as a compliment.

MR. LEHRER: And you saw it that way, didn't you?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I certainly did. But I think that I am -- obviously this was not my war alone, and the Administration -- this was an Administration decision. I believed in it. I am still convinced it was the right thing.

What was so terrific, Jim, last Friday the new Yugoslav Foreign Minister came in and said, "Thank you." And I said, "Thank you for saying thank you," because nobody had said that. I think we did the right thing, and I am proud of what the United States did.

MR. LEHRER: Is the conventional wisdom correct that in the highest levels of the Clinton Administration, when it came time to talk about should we use military force here, what should we do there, that you were the biggest and loudest arguer for military force?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I certainly was the one who believed that this was an appropriate place to use force. General Powell and I have -- he has documented some of these discussions, and we've had a lot of interesting discussions since.

But I was not alone, and the great supporter of this was President Clinton, who made the hard decisions. I think that it was a very important decision because there was this theory that the only way that the United States should use force was if it was going to be overwhelming.

MR. LEHRER: That's called "The Powell Doctrine."

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: It is called that, though I'm not sure it's fair to call it that. But that is what it's called. I really believed -- and still do -- that we have to have more -- a diplomatic word -- a "nuanced" approach to the use of force; it doesn't have to be all or nothing. We should be able to use limited force in limited areas. We also should be able to avail ourselves of peacekeeping operations where the United States doesn't have to be involved with our troops alone, but it is a tool that allows us to use force when we need to.

MR. LEHRER: Would it trouble you if somebody said what you just said was "The Albright Doctrine"?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Nobody ever names their own doctrine, and I don't think it's right.

MR. LEHRER: But is that -- well, go ahead.

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: But I do think that one of the hardest things to think about is how force and diplomacy work together; that diplomacy is strengthened if you can threaten the use of force that you're prepared to use. If you only think about the fact that you have to employ every piece of force that you have and you have to months to plan it and the earth is flat, you're never going to do anything. I think that we needed that flexibility. The Allies agreed with it. I think it shows that there needs to be the companionship of force and diplomacy.

MR. LEHRER: What about Cuba? Why were you not able to do anything about Cuba, or did you even want to do anything about Cuba?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Well, I think -- you know, I said what my greatest frustration was. My greatest disappointment is that I am not present for the time that the actuarial tables will actually work in Cuba, because that will end.

MR. LEHRER: You mean when Fidel Castro dies?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Well, you know, he's human and that must happen, and because change will come in Cuba. The people of Cuba deserve it. Clearly the system there and the fact that it's an island and that he was the original leader has made it more complicated.

What we have done, Jim is systematically put in a set of measures, as they're called, working within the law -- because Helms-Burton is the law, the embargo -- to try to increase the space of action for the people. So we have allowed more remittances to go and more travel and more cultural exchanges, and I think thereby created a little more space. But I wish we could have done more.

MR. LEHRER: What would you say to somebody who said: "Hey, wait a minute. Madame Secretary, you can go to North Korea but you can't go to Cuba?"

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I think it's a very different issue because of the threats that are involved. If we could change the dynamic on the Korean Peninsula, it would be a very large deal because it's the last remnant of the Cold War. Some people think it's the most -- one of the more dangerous places in the world. There was a different approach by Kim Jong Il, who turns out to be a bit different from his earlier version of what people thought he was like.

MR. LEHRER: Do you feel you've carried a special burden because you were the first woman Secretary of State?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I think I was observed more closely, but I am leaving my job thinking that it's actually a big advantage to be a woman Secretary of State. I have had a really interesting time. I have been able, I think, to add a whole new dimension to American foreign policy and absorb what are the new issues in foreign policy that --

MR. LEHRER: That you were special -- because you were a woman you were able to do that?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I think so. I think, and also to talk tough and be humane at the same time. I think that it may be easier for the next woman. I'm very glad that Condoleezza Rice is there as National Security Advisor. It shows that that was done fairly seamlessly, and people didn't ask, "Can she do it?" One of my daughters called me up and said, "I think that has something to do you with you, Mom." So I felt pretty good about that.

MR. LEHRER: I understand you're going to write a book now?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I am.

MR. LEHRER: What kind of book?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I'm going to try to write a book that shows -- my life has been really a reflection of the 20th Century, and the fact that I came out of Europe and that my -- people ask me whether my decisions are affected by my biography. Of course they are. I want to write about how I reflect the 20th Century. I want to write about the special role of the United States, because that is what I have believed.

I want to do something else, Jim, which is I think there is a false dichotomy that comes up when people say, well, they're Wilsonian and we're neo-realists. I think that's a phony choice. I think the most realistic foreign policy for the United States is one that reflects our values, because this is a very special country. I want to weave my personal story along with the policy issues, and I'm actually really looking forward to writing it.

MR. LEHRER: All right. Well, good luck to you, Madame Secretary. Thank you for coming on our program many times during the last eight years.

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: And thank you so much for asking me. They've always been terrific interviews. Thanks, Jim.

MR. LEHRER: Thank you.

[End of Document]
Blue Line

Secretary's Home Page | State Department Home Page